+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Posts 11 to 15 of 15
  1. #11

    Contractor Among Contractors

    DotasScandal's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    1,123
    Thanks (Given)
    130
    Thanks (Received)
    113
    Likes (Given)
    1334
    Likes (Received)
    359

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Finance View Post
    Its a rubbish number and propaganda worthy of Goebbels.
    Meet HMRC's very own little Goebbelses.... I wonder how many millions of public money have been funnelled into this psychological warfare outfit?
    https://www.dotas-scandal.org/behavi...d-at-it-again/
    "Helping people make better choices for themselves", no less.

  2. #12

    Still gathering requirements...


    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    20
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DotasScandal View Post
    Meet HMRC's very own little Goebbelses.... I wonder how many millions of public money have been funnelled into this psychological warfare outfit?
    https://www.dotas-scandal.org/behavi...d-at-it-again/
    "Helping people make better choices for themselves", no less.
    There was a steady stream of anti contractor articles in the media in the run up to the introduction of the new IR 35 rules. Presumably influenced by HMRC?

  3. #13
    sal
    sal is offline

    Contractor Among Contractors


    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    1,258
    Thanks (Given)
    1
    Thanks (Received)
    52
    Likes (Given)
    250
    Likes (Received)
    251

    Default

    An NHSI spokeswoman added: “We understand from the HMRC that the IR35 reforms concerning off-payroll are not designed to be retrospective in their application. This is a helpful and important clarification for NHS agency staff.”
    Meaning that the old rules apply and it's the PSC that is liable for the back taxes if an investigation proves that the prior engagement was inside IR35, not the client/agency.

    Not that there will be no investigations into prior engagements.

    All in all seems legit.

  4. #14

    Godlike

    northernladyuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Working the streets of your imagination
    Posts
    5,298
    Thanks (Given)
    667
    Thanks (Received)
    363
    Likes (Given)
    292
    Likes (Received)
    1568

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WordIsBond View Post
    87% take home on £100K? Impressive. 96% on £50K?

    Maybe you could get close to that if you pop £40K into your pension. And if a person on £100K as an employee who salary-sacrifices £40K into a pension isn't paying £34K.

    This is the kind of stuff that convinces people that HMRC are not interested in fairness. This is totally dishonest of them.

    When your tax authority engages in lying propaganda rather than just actually helping people calculate their taxes accurately, they need a complete house-cleaning.
    They are conveniently ignoring CT, because that isn't the person paying tax, is it?
    Where there's muck there's brass.

  5. #15

    Contractor Among Contractors


    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    1,372
    Thanks (Given)
    55
    Thanks (Received)
    111
    Likes (Given)
    781
    Likes (Received)
    641

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by northernladyuk View Post
    They are conveniently ignoring CT, because that isn't the person paying tax, is it?
    Of course they are.

    If they counted CT on £90K profit, so that the contractor pays £31K (compared to the employee paying £34K), it just wouldn't look so impressive, would it?

    As noted, the employee number doesn't count the ERNI, but they don't want to count that because they don't want the masses to twig to just how much tax is being paid on their earnings that could potentially be take home for them.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.