+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 ... LastLast
Posts 11 to 20 of 60

Thread: MoD

  1. #11

    I live on CUK

    SueEllen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    in the Park
    Posts
    22,506
    Thanks (Given)
    580
    Thanks (Received)
    598
    Likes (Given)
    3535
    Likes (Received)
    2811

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by northernladuk View Post
    If they were REALLY sensible they would now bin their dead wood, drop their rates to somewhere less than normal but just above PAYE and just pick the cream of the crop from the other agencies.
    Don't give them ideas.
    "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

  2. #12

    Nice But Dim

    DaveB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    18,426
    Thanks (Given)
    30
    Thanks (Received)
    677
    Likes (Given)
    324
    Likes (Received)
    2119

    Default

    Bit of a turn around from the events at the UKHO (MoD agency) which issued a blanket decree that all contractors were inside and say most of the subsequently leave.
    "Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.

  3. #13

    TykeLike

    SimonMac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    God's Own Republic Of Yorkshire
    Posts
    21,761
    Thanks (Given)
    220
    Thanks (Received)
    980
    Likes (Given)
    784
    Likes (Received)
    2741

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DaveB View Post
    Bit of a turn around from the events at the UKHO (MoD agency) which issued a blanket decree that all contractors were inside and say most of the subsequently leave.
    I thought UKHO went to BIS at the same time at the Met Office?
    “Live a good life. If there are gods and they are just, then they will not care how devout you have been, but will welcome you based on the virtues you have lived by. If there are gods, but unjust, then you should not want to worship them. If there are no gods, then you will be gone, but will have lived a noble life that will live on in the memories of your loved ones.”

    ― Marcus Aurelius

  4. #14

    Super poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    2,960
    Thanks (Given)
    137
    Thanks (Received)
    55
    Likes (Given)
    712
    Likes (Received)
    338

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by northernladuk View Post
    If they were REALLY sensible they would now bin their dead wood, drop their rates to somewhere less than normal but just above PAYE and just pick the cream of the crop from the other agencies.
    Dont be silly. The ones you might perceive as dead wood are doing what the MoD need out of them. Its the pups that run in and scream Im here to change the world next week that are the problem. Most of the guys that I have seen fail miserably recently have all been really good at their job from a normal point of view but completely unable to cope with the long drawn out time scales of delivering something to a procurement route.

    it drives them stupid then they offend people then they leave...

  5. #15

    Fingers like lightning


    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    573
    Thanks (Given)
    57
    Thanks (Received)
    65
    Likes (Given)
    294
    Likes (Received)
    260

    Default

    Interesting, as the MoD was one of the departments that was fined for non compliance, so you'd expect them to be extra risk adverse.

    https://www.gov.uk/government/news/s...ctor-published

  6. #16

    Super poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    2,960
    Thanks (Given)
    137
    Thanks (Received)
    55
    Likes (Given)
    712
    Likes (Received)
    338

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by teapot418 View Post
    Interesting, as the MoD was one of the departments that was fined for non compliance, so you'd expect them to be extra risk adverse.

    https://www.gov.uk/government/news/s...ctor-published
    Why? Being non-compliant and keeping your resources on site is massively cheaper than a tank or fighter jet...

    Its almost a no brainer. Im surprised more departments have not figured it out

  7. #17

    Ddraig Goch


    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Cymru
    Posts
    8,536
    Thanks (Given)
    86
    Thanks (Received)
    111
    Likes (Given)
    967
    Likes (Received)
    436

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AptoAccounting View Post
    Today the MoD communicated with its 'off-payroll appointees' regarding IR35 changes for the public sector. Whilst not explicit, the letter seems to imply that a contract review will be enough to satisfy them of employment status. Ideally a HMRC contract review or, alternatively, one from a 'competent person'.

    Very different line from the TfL saga.

    Is it beyond the public sector to have a coordinated response?
    Interesting and sensible approach maybe. Not sure if thats what HMRC are hoping though.

    Of course, you'll still get those who dont even bother getting their contract reviewed but if its just a case of getting a QDOS review up front then a lot of people will be safe.
    Rhyddid i lofnod psychocandy!!!!

  8. #18

    Godlike


    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    9,015
    Thanks (Given)
    597
    Thanks (Received)
    526
    Likes (Given)
    4060
    Likes (Received)
    2311

    Default

    Just the start I'm guessing .

    What a lovely clusterfeck, as predicted, this is turning out to be.

    Really is turning out much better than expected..


  9. #19

    Nervous Newbie


    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    2
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Default IR35 letter

    I am not quite so sure of the optimism. The letter actually states that one of the evidence criteria is:

    A contract review showing that you are outside the IR35 intermediaries legislaton and would not be deemed an employee if you had a contract directly with the MOD rather than through an intermediary. An HMRC Contract Review is preferred, but one from a competent person or organisation is acceptable (eg a tax accountant or advisor in a reputable company). ......

    So far so good?....now the sting....

    Please note that it is unlikely that we would consider a Contract Review to be be adequate assurance where your placement in the MOD is effectively "manpower substitution" (eg you have been provided under the Ccrown Commercial Service Contract Labour One framworks). Ie through Capita!

    The threat is the same as the Hydrographic office.... instant contract termination and HMRC notificaton.

  10. #20

    Nervous Newbie


    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    17
    Thanks (Given)
    1
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AptoAccounting View Post
    Today the MoD communicated with its 'off-payroll appointees' regarding IR35 changes for the public sector. Whilst not explicit, the letter seems to imply that a contract review will be enough to satisfy them of employment status. Ideally a HMRC contract review or, alternatively, one from a 'competent person'.

    Very different line from the TfL saga.

    Is it beyond the public sector to have a coordinated response?
    Are you sure that it is about the IR35 reform and not just the annual standard off-payroll tax assurance audit?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.