Closed Thread
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4
Posts 31 to 38 of 38
  1. #31

    Should post faster


    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    111
    Thanks (Given)
    5
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    16
    Likes (Received)
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by northernladuk View Post
    He hasn't got one. His read something somewhere and has decide to fart it on to the forum without thinking again so others have to clean the thread up again.
    Just because you suck admins off you think you can get away with abuse while no-one can say anything back as they are then "warned by admins"? I guess the admins will warn or ban me now but you get away with insults and abuse with no consequence.

    Teapot posted that RBS was not a public body without any analysis. All I was saying that that you need to look carefully at the OWNERSHIP of all companies to determine whether they fall within the meaning of a "public authority". I didn't see anyone else posting the info regarding being owned by the Crown.

  2. #32
    eek
    eek is offline

    bored now

    eek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    😂
    Posts
    21,430
    Thanks (Given)
    213
    Thanks (Received)
    1037
    Likes (Given)
    951
    Likes (Received)
    3165

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by breaktwister View Post
    Just because you suck admins off you think you can get away with abuse while no-one can say anything back as they are then "warned by admins"? I guess the admins will warn or ban me now but you get away with insults and abuse with no consequence.

    Teapot posted that RBS was not a public body without any analysis. All I was saying that that you need to look carefully at the OWNERSHIP of all companies to determine whether they fall within the meaning of a "public authority". I didn't see anyone else posting the info regarding being owned by the Crown.
    I think that might be because we've discussed RBS 3 times already including with you last week and nothing has changed during the past 3 months.

    RBS is not covered by the FoI act and therefore isn't affected by these changes.
    merely at clientco for the entertainment

  3. #33

    I live on CUK

    SueEllen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    in the Park
    Posts
    24,222
    Thanks (Given)
    793
    Thanks (Received)
    793
    Likes (Given)
    3886
    Likes (Received)
    3298

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by eek View Post
    I think that might be because we've discussed RBS 3 times already including with you last week and nothing has changed during the past 3 months.

    RBS is not covered by the FoI act and therefore isn't affected by these changes.
    Stop sucking off the admins.
    "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

  4. #34

    Godlike


    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Non-Event Horizon
    Posts
    8,660
    Thanks (Given)
    328
    Thanks (Received)
    582
    Likes (Given)
    2196
    Likes (Received)
    2609

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by northernladuk View Post
    Words fail me.
    That's a first.
    The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't exist

  5. #35

    My post count is Majestic

    northernladuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    31,699
    Thanks (Given)
    124
    Thanks (Received)
    1090
    Likes (Given)
    1570
    Likes (Received)
    5307

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LondonManc View Post
    That's a first.
    Ones that I can post without a ban then....
    'CUK forum personality of 2011' - Winner - Yes really!!!!

  6. #36

    Godlike


    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    9,830
    Thanks (Given)
    668
    Thanks (Received)
    644
    Likes (Given)
    4532
    Likes (Received)
    2607

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SueEllen View Post
    Stop sucking off the admins.


    I thought NAT seemed a lot happier these days

  7. #37

    Godlike


    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Non-Event Horizon
    Posts
    8,660
    Thanks (Given)
    328
    Thanks (Received)
    582
    Likes (Given)
    2196
    Likes (Received)
    2609

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by breaktwister View Post
    Just because you suck admins off you think you can get away with abuse while no-one can say anything back as they are then "warned by admins"? I guess the admins will warn or ban me now but you get away with insults and abuse with no consequence.

    Teapot posted that RBS was not a public body without any analysis. All I was saying that that you need to look carefully at the OWNERSHIP of all companies to determine whether they fall within the meaning of a "public authority". I didn't see anyone else posting the info regarding being owned by the Crown.
    Teapot explained why RBS wasn't subject to FOI. You backed it up. Not sure what your beef is because Teapot gave you the correct answer with a supporting statement.
    The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't exist

  8. #38

    Some things in Moderation

    cojak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Look to your right...
    Posts
    17,605
    Thanks (Given)
    422
    Thanks (Received)
    856
    Likes (Given)
    3805
    Likes (Received)
    2467

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by breaktwister View Post
    Just because you suck admins off you think you can get away with abuse while no-one can say anything back as they are then "warned by admins"? I guess the admins will warn or ban me now but you get away with insults and abuse with no consequence.

    Teapot posted that RBS was not a public body without any analysis. All I was saying that that you need to look carefully at the OWNERSHIP of all companies to determine whether they fall within the meaning of a "public authority". I didn't see anyone else posting the info regarding being owned by the Crown.
    No, it does not require analysis - it simply requires reading the list of organisations that fall within the remit of the FOI Act.

    That's it. Nothing more, nothing less.

    Anything else is navel gazing.

    And as we have returned to the original point of this thread I am now locking it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.