+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Posts 1 to 10 of 36
  1. #1

    Still gathering requirements...


    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    53
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    7
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    12

    Default How do you know if your contract is public sector

    OK - I know I'm going to get shot down in flames for this...

    I've read LOTS of material but still can't find answer.

    Assuming a PSC has a contract with, let's say HPE. The contractor is working on an account HPE has - the MoD (for example). Is this PSC caught by the new legislation? It seems to me they are - but since they aren't contracted directly by the MoD, I'm not so sure.

    And if the same PSC does 3 days a week on their HPE contract on a MoD account and 2 days on a private-sector account...? Is the entire contracted remuneration caught? Or just 2/5 of it?

  2. #2

    Double Godlike!

    malvolio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Walking in the garden, dreaming of Olivia...
    Posts
    10,075
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    177
    Likes (Given)
    4
    Likes (Received)
    623

    Default

    It's magic, it just happens...

    Actually nobody really knows but at some point in the daisy chain someone has to report back to HMRC how may contractors it is using, probably through copies of itemised invoices to the relevant engager.

    Contracts are single events, if you have two, one PS and one not, the rules apply to the PS one. It has still not been explained just how we account for all the variations, such as deducted ERNICs, in our company accounts.

    So don't try and apply logic, there isn't any. Simplest way out is not to take on any PS work and let them work it out.
    Blog? What blog...?

  3. #3

    Super poster

    jamesbrown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    4,752
    Thanks (Given)
    56
    Thanks (Received)
    288
    Likes (Given)
    496
    Likes (Received)
    1418

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jonnieboy View Post
    OK - I know I'm going to get shot down in flames for this...

    I've read LOTS of material but still can't find answer.

    Assuming a PSC has a contract with, let's say HPE. The contractor is working on an account HPE has - the MoD (for example). Is this PSC caught by the new legislation? It seems to me they are - but since they aren't contracted directly by the MoD, I'm not so sure.

    And if the same PSC does 3 days a week on their HPE contract on a MoD account and 2 days on a private-sector account...? Is the entire contracted remuneration caught? Or just 2/5 of it?
    It's based on the Freedom of Information Act. In terms of your specific question, this is unlikely to be caught, and the precise scenario you present was referred to in the consultation when justifying the exclusion of private companies that deliver a public function (i.e. public vs. private sector contracts delivered by a private company). Providing HPE are contracted to deliver a public function and not to supply BoS contractors to a public agency covered by the FOI Act, you should be fine.

  4. #4

    Super poster

    jamesbrown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    4,752
    Thanks (Given)
    56
    Thanks (Received)
    288
    Likes (Given)
    496
    Likes (Received)
    1418

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by malvolio View Post
    Simplest way out is not to take on any PS work and let them work it out.
    Notwithstanding what I said, I agree with this as a point of principle. There are grey areas w/r to the delivery of a public function vs. supply of labour to a FOI agency.

  5. #5

    Still gathering requirements...


    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    53
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    7
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jamesbrown View Post
    It's based on the Freedom of Information Act. In terms of your specific question, this is unlikely to be caught, and the precise scenario you present was referred to in the consultation when justifying the exclusion of private companies that deliver a public function (i.e. public vs. private sector contracts delivered by a private company). Providing HPE are contracted to deliver a public function and not to supply BoS contractors to a public agency covered by the FOI Act, you should be fine.
    Thanks for your view, jamesbrown. I was thinking that this was likely to be the case - although will obviously have to see if the intermediaries in the chain agree...

  6. #6

    More time posting than coding


    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    In a permanent state of hatred for orange goblins.
    Posts
    217
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    5
    Likes (Given)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jamesbrown View Post
    It's based on the Freedom of Information Act. In terms of your specific question, this is unlikely to be caught, and the precise scenario you present was referred to in the consultation when justifying the exclusion of private companies that deliver a public function (i.e. public vs. private sector contracts delivered by a private company). Providing HPE are contracted to deliver a public function and not to supply BoS contractors to a public agency covered by the FOI Act, you should be fine.
    Excuse my poor understanding, isn't it the responsibility of the public sector org to determine the status - or is that only when contracting direct to them?

    Assuming the above was fine - consultancy delivering functionality not acting as an agency to put bums on seats, aren't there going to be gray areas?

    Take somewhere like DVLA. SME win the gig to deliver functionality. SME need to recruit to deliver that functionality - work to be performed on client site. SME not bound by FoI. DVLA require any consultants / SME staff / contractors at SME on site to have active SC - wouldn't DVLA then be transferring / applying for the SC in that instance, thus would consider that SME to be acting as an agent due to that?

    My head hurts, which I suspect was the rationale for the changes.

  7. #7

    Should post faster


    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    161
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    3
    Likes (Received)
    39

    Default

    It seems clear to me that nobody knows how all of this will work. Hence, the advice to avoid all PS work, if possible.

  8. #8

    My post count is Majestic

    northernladuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    31,512
    Thanks (Given)
    124
    Thanks (Received)
    1060
    Likes (Given)
    1559
    Likes (Received)
    5236

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fidot View Post
    It seems clear to me that nobody knows how all of this will work. Hence, the advice to avoid all PS work, if possible.
    I think that is just as pertinent now as it was when we said it 6 months or more ago. It's not new advice.

    I was well in to all this and spent many hours discussing and reading up about it while in the PS. Now I'm out its a breath of fresh air.
    'CUK forum personality of 2011' - Winner - Yes really!!!!

  9. #9

    Should post faster


    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    161
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    3
    Likes (Received)
    39

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by northernladuk View Post
    I think that is just as pertinent now as it was when we said it 6 months or more ago. It's not new advice.

    I was well in to all this and spent many hours discussing and reading up about it while in the PS. Now I'm out its a breath of fresh air.
    Agree, I certainly wasn't trying to claim it as new advice.

  10. #10

    Godlike


    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Non-Event Horizon
    Posts
    8,658
    Thanks (Given)
    328
    Thanks (Received)
    582
    Likes (Given)
    2196
    Likes (Received)
    2609

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by northernladuk View Post
    I think that is just as pertinent now as it was when we said it 6 months or more ago. It's not new advice.

    I was well in to all this and spent many hours discussing and reading up about it while in the PS. Now I'm out its a breath of fresh air.
    Indeed but it's nice to see a new influx of contractors who are seeing the problem earlier than April. They need to spread the word within their teams about the issues faced; similarly Andy needs to get the discussion up and running across agencies - there's money to be made for all of us if rates have to increase.
    The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't exist

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.