This question is mainly around what constitutes an "employment intermediary" for purposes of T&S. This article from Crunch indicates that many traditional businesses that would not consider themselves to be "employment intermediaries" are unwittingly caught by the wide definition:
https://www.crunch.co.uk/blog/contra...oure-affected/
"includes consulting services companies, facilities management, the events industry, the hospitality sector, the care sector, the audio-visual Industry – basically anyone who is hiring out workers to another business" I would add solicitors firms to the list.
I have also seen HMRC give this definition in a number of places: "An intermediary is any person who makes arrangements for an individual to work for a third party or be paid for work done for a third party". Well that just describes a huge percentage of the business that goes on in the country!
I am trying to figure out why consultancy firms, small or Big 4, can offset T&S for their employees who travel to perform work at temporary location (payrolled consultants of course). Why can they offset these costs as business expenses but an umbrella company cannot? It surely has to do with the definition of an "employment intermediary" but what makes a Big 4 consultancy firm "not an employment intermediary"? I know that they sometimes perform larger pieces of work on fixed bid basis but the typical is to charge out a daily rate for the personal services of a payrolled consultant which makes them an "employment intermediary" in that activity.
https://www.crunch.co.uk/blog/contra...oure-affected/
"includes consulting services companies, facilities management, the events industry, the hospitality sector, the care sector, the audio-visual Industry – basically anyone who is hiring out workers to another business" I would add solicitors firms to the list.
I have also seen HMRC give this definition in a number of places: "An intermediary is any person who makes arrangements for an individual to work for a third party or be paid for work done for a third party". Well that just describes a huge percentage of the business that goes on in the country!
I am trying to figure out why consultancy firms, small or Big 4, can offset T&S for their employees who travel to perform work at temporary location (payrolled consultants of course). Why can they offset these costs as business expenses but an umbrella company cannot? It surely has to do with the definition of an "employment intermediary" but what makes a Big 4 consultancy firm "not an employment intermediary"? I know that they sometimes perform larger pieces of work on fixed bid basis but the typical is to charge out a daily rate for the personal services of a payrolled consultant which makes them an "employment intermediary" in that activity.
Comment