Quote:
Originally Posted by zeitghost
I've just corrected the magic number in the wfax thingie, the chart is now more or less vertical...
Current one is "Wave Height prediction" for wave heights > 2m. |
When you say "more or less", are you allowing for minor timing variations? Sometimes cutting a little slack (aka rounding to a lower level of precision) can lead to better results, when dealing with a data source that is inherently a bit noisy.
You also need to take account of the fact that aliasing issues can arise if you are mapping a comparatively low resolution input to a high resolution output - you should determine a mapping equation that will transform the input space to the output space without introducing noise derived solely from the mapping.
Quote:
Originally Posted by zeitghost
It's covering the North Atlantic, from the UK/France/Spain to the Eastern seaboard of Septicland.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zeitghost
On that happy note...
Byeeeee |
Bye Zeity - I'm very glad to find that the background-data-gathering-exercise for your latest Cunning Plan is working, even though it'll probably lead me to a life of servitude in the Sugar Mines
Linear Mode
