+ Reply to Thread
Page 135 of 136 FirstFirst ... 35 85 125 133 134 135 136 LastLast
Posts 1,341 to 1,350 of 1358
  1. #1341

    Nervous Newbie


    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Westminster
    Posts
    4
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Golddustz147 View Post
    Now that my previous post has been validated - viz Rangers losing major case. Who is the sad act now ? I pity you ... Please seek some major help . You genuinely need it .. No Disrespects .
    Do you know this ruling affects the tax liability of Rangers employees?

  2. #1342

    Nervous Newbie


    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    17
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Golddustz147 View Post
    Now that my previous post has been validated - viz Rangers losing major case. Who is the sad act now ? I pity you ... Please seek some major help . You genuinely need it .. No Disrespects .
    Personally I don't need any help, but whatever the Rangers result you're still a sad act.

  3. #1343

    Contractor Among Contractors


    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    WTT Consulting Ltd - London and online
    Posts
    1,526
    Thanks (Given)
    24
    Thanks (Received)
    266
    Likes (Given)
    66
    Likes (Received)
    513

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Golddustz147 View Post
    Now that my previous post has been validated - viz Rangers losing major case. Who is the sad act now ? I pity you ... Please seek some major help . You genuinely need it .. No Disrespects .
    Yes, HMRC has won the case and the result is that the EMPLOYER is liable to tax.

    I suggest that far from being "validated", your previous post has been further damaged.

    Unless HMRC can transfer liability from employer to employee in the Murray Group case, they will be forced to accept a percentage of their demands with the rest of the creditors in the liquidation. I have not studied the facts around each individual, not available to the public, but I would be surprised if a transfer of liability happened and individuals received demands that forced them to pay.

  4. #1344

    Still gathering requirements...


    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    32
    Thanks (Given)
    4
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TheHat View Post
    Why do you care if people pay or not? You come across like a bit of a sad act.
    +1

  5. #1345

    Some things in Moderation

    cojak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Look to your right...
    Posts
    17,814
    Thanks (Given)
    462
    Thanks (Received)
    952
    Likes (Given)
    4025
    Likes (Received)
    2638

    Default

    Please be aware that this forum is moderated.

    @Golddustz147 and TheHat - I do not expect this spat to go any further.

  6. #1346

    Still gathering requirements...


    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    32
    Thanks (Given)
    4
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

  7. #1347

    Still gathering requirements...


    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    33
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Default Actinium Management Limited / AML

    I received three enquiry letters from HMRC relating to Actinium Management Ltd for the FYs 2004-2005, 2005-2006, and 2006-2007. Apart from receining the letters, I have heard nothing from HMRC since then.

    On occasion, over the years, I have contacted one of the directors of Actinium to see if he has heard anything from HMRC regarding the enquiries (I understand other contractors also received enquiry letters for the same period). My understanding is that there has been no contact with HMRC on the matter since about 2010.

    Does anyone reading this post have any information to add to this? Have any other contarctors had more recent contact with HMRC re: Actinium?

  8. #1348

    TripleIronDad

    BrilloPad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    95,105
    Thanks (Given)
    19473
    Thanks (Received)
    5087
    Likes (Given)
    19473
    Likes (Received)
    8872

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by backrubber View Post
    I received three enquiry letters from HMRC relating to Actinium Management Ltd for the FYs 2004-2005, 2005-2006, and 2006-2007. Apart from receining the letters, I have heard nothing from HMRC since then.

    On occasion, over the years, I have contacted one of the directors of Actinium to see if he has heard anything from HMRC regarding the enquiries (I understand other contractors also received enquiry letters for the same period). My understanding is that there has been no contact with HMRC on the matter since about 2010.

    Does anyone reading this post have any information to add to this? Have any other contarctors had more recent contact with HMRC re: Actinium?
    What sort of enquiry letter was it?

    In general, once an enquiry has opened, it will last forever. You will probably hear nothing from HMRC until 2020. Assuming the 2019 legislation goes ahead (unlikely after the General Election and Murray decision).
    Katy Perry - don't be afraid to catch feels. Taylor Swift - feels $1 a go.

  9. #1349

    Still gathering requirements...


    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    33
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BrilloPad View Post
    What sort of enquiry letter was it?
    I would have to fish out the letters to see exactly what they were. The first was different to the second and third - I remember that. The first was more along the lines of "we are enquiring into your tax return", whereas the second and third were more "we intend to look into you tax return".

    All three related to dividend payments - the Actinium scheme was not an EBT / loan scheme.

    Like anyone, I don't like having this hanging over my head and would like to resolve it one way or another. The scheme was insured by QDOS consulting and I still have insurance with them, so I might (should) be covered anyway.

    I might contact QDOS to see what they think.

  10. #1350

    TripleIronDad

    BrilloPad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    95,105
    Thanks (Given)
    19473
    Thanks (Received)
    5087
    Likes (Given)
    19473
    Likes (Received)
    8872

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by backrubber View Post
    I would have to fish out the letters to see exactly what they were. The first was different to the second and third - I remember that. The first was more along the lines of "we are enquiring into your tax return", whereas the second and third were more "we intend to look into you tax return".

    All three related to dividend payments - the Actinium scheme was not an EBT / loan scheme.

    Like anyone, I don't like having this hanging over my head and would like to resolve it one way or another. The scheme was insured by QDOS consulting and I still have insurance with them, so I might (should) be covered anyway.

    I might contact QDOS to see what they think.
    It would depend on the wording. However I have been led to believe that they can take as long as they like. The good news for you is the the schemes were not DOTAS notifiable so they can't issue an APN.

    You could contact HMRC and say you want to settle - though the insurance would definitely not pay out. Or get a CTD.

    Amusingly Montpelier lost the DTA case partly on the basis they had not acted quickly enough! Its a very one sided relationship - bullying, harassment and intimidation are totally allowed by HMRC. Rather like marriage.

    I feel for you - I am 10 years into my fight with HMRC. At least another 10 years to go. I suspect my 2nd marriage is about the same.
    Katy Perry - don't be afraid to catch feels. Taylor Swift - feels $1 a go.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 135 of 136 FirstFirst ... 35 85 125 133 134 135 136 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.