MP Greg Mulholland. EBT mis-selling
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Posts 1 to 10 of 16
  1. #1

    Nervous Newbie


    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    3
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Default MP Greg Mulholland. EBT mis-selling

    Hello Folks, I came across this article and will certainly be writing to my MP to ask for their support on this motion.

    LibDem MP Greg Mulholland has tabled an early day motion calling for HMRC to review the tax treatment of those using avoidance schemes which have been challenged. 27.04.17
    https://www.cchdaily.co.uk/mp-wants-...scheme-victims

    EDM link here
    Early day motions by Member for 2016-17 - Mulholland, Greg - UK Parliament

    Link to find your local MP if anyone wants to do the same:-
    Contact your MP - UK Parliament

  2. #2

    TripleIronDad

    BrilloPad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Littering gel wrappers in Surrey
    Posts
    95,828
    Thanks (Given)
    20504
    Thanks (Received)
    5266
    Likes (Given)
    20504
    Likes (Received)
    9154

    Default

    Since parliament reports to HMRC I can't see this getting anywhere.

    NTRT tried very hard with a lobbying campaign and got nowhere.

    An MPs early day motion is worth about the same as one of my early day motions after a day of eating fruit.

    I hope it will be different this time.
    Katy Perry - don't be afraid to catch feels. Taylor Swift - feels $1 a go.

  3. #3

    Old Greg is my bitch's bitch

    northernladyuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Working the streets of your imagination
    Posts
    7,131
    Thanks (Given)
    956
    Thanks (Received)
    478
    Likes (Given)
    338
    Likes (Received)
    1975

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Since parliament reports to HMRC
    No it doesn't.
    Where there's muck there's brass.

  4. #4

    I live on CUK

    SueEllen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    in the Park
    Posts
    26,913
    Thanks (Given)
    1254
    Thanks (Received)
    1025
    Likes (Given)
    4377
    Likes (Received)
    3935

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Since parliament reports to HMRC I can't see this getting anywhere.
    HMRC report to parliament but only when the relevant minister is asked a question or it involves a select committee.
    "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

  5. #5

    Should post faster


    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    127
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    6
    Likes (Given)
    4
    Likes (Received)
    12

    Default

    Were the EBT's actually miss-sold?

    Or have HMRC just introduced new legislation that mean they can now issue contractors with a tax bill?

    I used a scheme and don't feel I was miss-sold at all. Everything I was told upon joining was correct.

  6. #6

    Contractor Among Contractors


    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    WTT Consulting Ltd - London and online
    Posts
    1,553
    Thanks (Given)
    24
    Thanks (Received)
    272
    Likes (Given)
    68
    Likes (Received)
    523

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SueEllen View Post
    HMRC report to parliament but only when the relevant minister is asked a question or it involves a select committee.
    No it doesn't.

    HMRC is an agency of H M Treasury and reports to the Chancellor.

    H M Treasury reports to Parliament.

    HMRC is called before Public Accounts Committee regularly (and always deflects the real questions as MPs are more concerned about why the phone is not answered) and reports on certain matters there.

  7. #7

    Nervous Newbie


    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    9
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WalterWhite View Post
    Were the EBT's actually miss-sold?

    Or have HMRC just introduced new legislation that mean they can now issue contractors with a tax bill?

    I used a scheme and don't feel I was miss-sold at all. Everything I was told upon joining was correct.
    Certainly interesting and debatable.
    Claims to the effect of "we are HMRC compliant" and "we are operating within the current legal framework" are some that come to mind.
    If the above was true then why are we all in this situation. If legislation can retrospectively change laws then surely that affects statements that we were sold on as well, it needs to be the big picture not just part of it.

  8. #8

    TripleIronDad

    BrilloPad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Littering gel wrappers in Surrey
    Posts
    95,828
    Thanks (Given)
    20504
    Thanks (Received)
    5266
    Likes (Given)
    20504
    Likes (Received)
    9154

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by webberg View Post
    No it doesn't.

    HMRC is an agency of H M Treasury and reports to the Chancellor.

    H M Treasury reports to Parliament.

    HMRC is called before Public Accounts Committee regularly (and always deflects the real questions as MPs are more concerned about why the phone is not answered) and reports on certain matters there.
    Only on a technicality. Parliament rarely questions HMRC on what they do and how they behave.
    Katy Perry - don't be afraid to catch feels. Taylor Swift - feels $1 a go.

  9. #9

    Should post faster


    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    127
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    6
    Likes (Given)
    4
    Likes (Received)
    12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by woftam View Post
    Certainly interesting and debatable.
    Claims to the effect of "we are HMRC compliant" and "we are operating within the current legal framework" are some that come to mind.
    If the above was true then why are we all in this situation. If legislation can retrospectively change laws then surely that affects statements that we were sold on as well, it needs to be the big picture not just part of it.
    "we are HMRC compliant" and "we are operating within the current legal framework"

    those were true (and I think/hope still are for the scheme I used)

    With regards to retrospective legislation, playing devils advocate here, would it be fair to say that IFA's should cease selling pension and savings products because the rules could retrospectively change? Of course not.

    I will admit that if my provider wasn't still around and (currently) helping their clients I may take a different view on things!

  10. #10

    Contractor Among Contractors


    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    WTT Consulting Ltd - London and online
    Posts
    1,553
    Thanks (Given)
    24
    Thanks (Received)
    272
    Likes (Given)
    68
    Likes (Received)
    523

    Default

    Arguably PAC forced Hartnett to resign over his dealings with a well known bank.

    They also managed to spectacularly confuse Ms Homer on a number of occasions.

    The big difficulty is that HMRC always has the "taxpayer confidentiality" argument to hide behind.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.