• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Montpelier DTA scheme bulletin

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Twitter Activity - please join in.

    Hi all.
    We tried this before to awaken some MPs to the injustice of Retro tax, 2019 Charge.
    We're trying again, hopefully, this time we will have MPs doing their
    research & voting to squash this injustice.
    Please get onto twitter and help the good fight:

    The list so far is:

    @dotasscandal
    @HMRCon
    @Uk_Tax_Gone_Mad
    @HMRCVictim
    @lfcynwa1974
    @NoToRetroTax
    @apn_hater
    @retrotaxobscene ‏
    @RuinedByRetro
    @BeenGauked ‏
    @retrotaxvictim
    @nearlybankrupt
    @HMRobbinCs
    @jujnjury


    list of mps to add
    MPs on Twitter: Information, statistics and analysis about the members of UK Parliament using Twitter

    Hashtags to use
    #noretrotax
    #2019charge
    #apn
    #retrotax
    #TaxAmnesty

    If you're with WTT then follow the thread:
    WTT Big Group › Forums › General Tax Discussion ->
    twitter unofficial campaign/self help - spread the word

    Comment


      Originally posted by DealorNoDeal View Post
      hello harry

      Hello Frank

      Comment


        Originally posted by Laxmi View Post
        We tried this before to awaken some MPs to the injustice of Retro tax, 2019 Charge.
        We're trying again, hopefully, this time we will have MPs doing their
        research & voting to squash this injustice.


        You stand more chance of getting Harry to post sense.

        The only way is legal action.

        Comment


          The below was posted on another thread but as the post it responds to appears to have been repeated across many threads, I make no apology for repeating it here.

          Re the above suggestions for a twitter campaign.

          As a representative of WTT, can I make it clear that we are not organising or running this campaign via Twitter.

          Whilst we are supportive of the motives behind the proposal, a public campaign such as this is not our preferred route to finding a resolution, on the basis that the inevitable uncoordinated nature of posts from many sources could lead to a loss of focus on the key messages that we consider are effective routes to that resolution.

          We wish all those involved, (WTT clients, WTT Big Group members and others), the very best of luck in achieving their objectives, but this is an initiative that we cannot support at this time.
          Best Forum Adviser & Forum Personality of the Year 2018.

          (No, me neither).

          Comment


            Newcastle win permission for High Court challenge | Daily Mail Online

            WG never did get revenge for the illegal raids on him. I hope he is following this closely. With thanks to the poster who pointed out to me the article.

            Comment


              Yesterday I mentioned to a team member that I was the victim of retrospective legislation. After a bit of discussion another colleague mentioned Montpelier. We went for a quiet chat and there were in the scheme for a while. And they follow the CUK threads.

              I asked who they knew from the forum. No-one was the reply. I then asked whose posts they liked. "Brillopad is quite vocal - but I don't know him" came back. Oh yes you do I responded. There was then the sound of the penny dropping for a while.

              Good to see fame has spread my way. My ex-wives got the fortune.

              Comment


                Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
                Yesterday I mentioned to a team member that I was the victim of retrospective legislation. After a bit of discussion another colleague mentioned Montpelier. We went for a quiet chat and there were in the scheme for a while. And they follow the CUK threads.

                I asked who they knew from the forum. No-one was the reply. I then asked whose posts they liked. "Brillopad is quite vocal - but I don't know him" came back. Oh yes you do I responded. There was then the sound of the penny dropping for a while.

                Good to see fame has spread my way. My ex-wives got the fortune.

                reminds me of the time i out'd you after reading this thread and knowing f4j and putting 2 and 2.

                happy days my friend ... happy days.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by CanPayButWouldRatherNot View Post
                  reminds me of the time i out'd you after reading this thread and knowing f4j and putting 2 and 2.

                  happy days my friend ... happy days.
                  Indeed.

                  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3KEhWTnWvE

                  Comment


                    Montpelier Fee

                    Montpelier have sent me a bill for looking at my FNs and APNs and drafting a reply. They never mentioned in advance that there would be a fee for that work. Anyone else had the same? How did you respond?

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by mossman View Post
                      Montpelier have sent me a bill for looking at my FNs and APNs and drafting a reply. They never mentioned in advance that there would be a fee for that work. Anyone else had the same? How did you respond?

                      "We will in due course send a small fee note for work scrutinizing the notices and drafting the representations" ...was at the end of the email that response letters were attached too.

                      Wouldn't say £2.5k is a very small fee note!!!!

                      Anyone else's that high?!!! OMG!!!!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X