+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 84 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 12 52 ... LastLast
Posts 11 to 20 of 839

Thread: BIG GROUP

  1. #11

    Banned


    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Atlantis
    Posts
    8,066
    Thanks (Given)
    184
    Thanks (Received)
    117
    Likes (Given)
    222
    Likes (Received)
    531

    Default

    Sounds like a wise step to take, it will do no harm at all to have an organised approach. Hopefully as a group you can reach an equitable solution.

  2. #12

    Contractor Among Contractors


    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    WTT Consulting Ltd - London and online
    Posts
    1,365
    Thanks (Given)
    22
    Thanks (Received)
    218
    Likes (Given)
    60
    Likes (Received)
    443

    Default Good numbers and bad

    OK, I've done a very basic spreadsheet.

    (Excel is so simple even tax types can use it).

    Based on my projections and assumptions which are:

    Space starting at 700 a month and increasing every 12 months.
    4 full time people - head admin at 60k, 1 x 45k, 2 x 30k increasing at 3% pa and 10% bonus at end
    Professional fees at 1.7m to include weekly supervision and advice on strategy - attending steering group meetings etc plus advocate for cases (I've spread these evenly from month 3 onwards but in reality much more lumpy)
    Monthly overhead at 5% of income, reducing to 2.5%.

    Hoping we may know some people who have some cloud space and some expertise in IT who might do a job for cash in hand.

    If that is about right.

    We would need 500 people paying 60 to seed the group.

    That is 50 starter plus 10 monthly fee.

    The starter fee to be repaid from surplus funds around 12 months later.

    Then we build - aggressively.

    If you're not on board in 6 months, the boat has sailed.

    Monthly cost is 10 for 60 months.

    In the event that resolution is quickly the balance unpaid is accelerated. In other words if we're done and dusted at month 18, you have to pay (60-18)*10 because the QC's etc still need paying.

    At 10 a month we need 4,650 members.
    At 12 a month we need 3,875 members.
    At 15 a month we need 3,100 members.
    At 20 a month we need 2,330 members.

    We need a steering group. I suggest no more than 0.25% of total membership otherwise top heavy.

    The numbers appear to work although there are some squeaky bum months but trying to predict when fees might hit is a guessing game and anything beyond 6 months is increasingly inaccurate.

    In terms of operation it would be a steering group of members plus an expert panel (willing to act for contingent or monthly fees). After an initial flurry of meetings perhaps once a month. Admin officer (actually more a coordinator role running the office and website etc) to report regularly and via website updates.

    All cash contributions to be held in name of steering committee (not experts or fee earners) and released only on suitable mandate.

    Any surplus funds to be returned.

    Objectives to be clearly established and pursued.

    Confidentiality CRITICAL.

    NEXT STEPS

    Develop the brief and ideas for objectives
    Expressions of interest.
    Private forum - offers to set up please?
    (self) Nominations for steering committee - probably not permanent


    DECLARATION

    I have been pushing the idea of a cross provider group for a long time.
    I do see commercial advantage in it for my new firm but I'd be happy to take part in a beauty parade of potential members of the expert panel and take my chances.
    I'd be happy to model objectives and articles etc on those I have for other tax groups but I reserve the right to charge for my time to get this established but would agree a cap.

  3. #13

    More time posting than coding

    flamel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    London
    Posts
    342
    Thanks (Given)
    68
    Thanks (Received)
    28
    Likes (Given)
    180
    Likes (Received)
    88

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TykeMerc View Post
    Hopefully as a group you can reach an equitable solution.
    That's the plan - we should remind HMRC of one of the maxims of equity "delay defeats equity"

  4. #14

    Contractor Among Contractors


    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    WTT Consulting Ltd - London and online
    Posts
    1,365
    Thanks (Given)
    22
    Thanks (Received)
    218
    Likes (Given)
    60
    Likes (Received)
    443

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by squirrel View Post
    Do you think HMRC would allow the 10 a month to be included in my list of outgoings when I'm working out my APN TTP with them ;-)
    Absolutely.

    This is a compliant, DOTAS registered and notified scheme.

  5. #15

    Contractor Among Contractors

    DotasScandal's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    1,115
    Thanks (Given)
    125
    Thanks (Received)
    109
    Likes (Given)
    1283
    Likes (Received)
    352

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by webberg View Post
    Hoping we may know some people who have some cloud space and some expertise in IT who might do a job for cash in hand.
    Cash in hand? I hope David Gauke isn't reading

  6. #16

    Banned


    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    220
    Thanks (Given)
    8
    Thanks (Received)
    4
    Likes (Given)
    60
    Likes (Received)
    32

    Default

    I am in. But can I clarify.

    Will this action group include Post 2011 schemes as well?

  7. #17

    More time posting than coding


    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    330
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Given)
    6
    Likes (Received)
    49

    Default

    1) lets setup the sheet on google docs and allow others to comment and see

    2) I can do the website. Host it in cloud - azure. Will do my work for free - only charge the hosting cost. (If anyone else wants to do it welcome)

    3) do we need to form an association or something?

    4) my biggest concern is that to defend the scheme, we will need details and documentation on how the schemes were implemented. Don't know how we can get that with promoters gone (for me luckily promoter is around and doing it)

    5) don't we need a more concrete action plan and what the benefits would be? What the 4 staffs would do ( I would have thought a project co ordinator - prince certified - like my wife would be enough for office work instead of 4 - might be wrong without a more detailed plan)

  8. #18

    Nervous Newbie


    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    8
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2

    Default

    I'm in...

  9. #19

    Super poster

    Scruff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Londres
    Posts
    2,287
    Thanks (Given)
    32
    Thanks (Received)
    88
    Likes (Given)
    392
    Likes (Received)
    334

    Default

    Where is the .xlsx? I could do with the technical calc? Je suis Charlie
    We have a poverty of intellect....
    QDOS Referral Code http://www.qdoscontractor.com/code/QCL26507
    IPSE Referral Code http://www.ipse.co.uk/join/IPSE01396

  10. #20

    More time posting than coding


    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    306
    Thanks (Given)
    44
    Thanks (Received)
    18
    Likes (Given)
    204
    Likes (Received)
    97

    Default United we are stronger

    Count me in.

    HMRC need to understand that we can make it a costly exercise and time consuming for them too

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.