• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Cold cold cold

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    4 months. But I'll have it done by lunch.
    Hours instead of days, Jim.
    Will work inside IR35. Or for food.

    Comment


      #22
      If you think my attitude stinks, you should smell my fingers.

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by hyperD View Post


        97% of govt sponsored science stating that the planet is warming and is caused by humans agree that the planet is warming and is caused by humans.

        Stunning statistical "fact" that.

        Even by sasguru's standards.

        Comment


          #24
          The paper actually says that 97% agree that anthropogenic global warming is caused by mankind.

          I am 100% sure that any anthropogenic global waming is caused by mankind.

          eejits
          (\__/)
          (>'.'<)
          ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

          Comment


            #25
            The title also says that 97% of people who expressed a view on anthropogenic global warming agreed global warming was happening in the first place. So they left out all the people who expressed a view on the other kind, who probably also think it's happening.
            Originally posted by MaryPoppins
            I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
            Originally posted by vetran
            Urine is quite nourishing

            Comment


              #26
              The paper actually says that 97% agree that anthropogenic global warming is caused by mankind.
              From which I can deduce that you have not read it and prefer to get your 'science' from the classically-trainer Christopher Monckton, Viscount of Benchley, writing on gosh - a blog.

              The Collapsing ‘Consensus’ | Watts Up With That?

              If there ever was an 'eejit', it's Monckton. Lord Monckton’s Rap Sheet | Climate Asylum
              Last edited by pjclarke; 29 May 2013, 08:56.
              My subconscious is annoying. It's got a mind of its own.

              Comment


                #27
                The best argument about what´s happening to the climate, is...

                "look out the f****ing window".

                CairnGorm Mountain Webcams // Winterhighland Webcams Scottish Ski Club Hut and Ptarmigan Bowl // Winterhighland

                Snow practically all the year round in the cairngorms.
                I'm alright Jack

                Comment


                  #28
                  The title also says that 97% of people who expressed a view on anthropogenic global warming agreed global warming was happening in the first place. So they left out all the people who expressed a view on the other kind, who probably also think it's happening.
                  The paper is free, it takes about 10-15 minutes to read. Call me old-fashioned, but reading a piece before you trash it seems to me a more sensible sequence than the opposite, and reduces the risk of making oneself look like a prejudiced numpty.
                  My subconscious is annoying. It's got a mind of its own.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    I'm a bit busy at the moment, putting my gloves and scarf on
                    (\__/)
                    (>'.'<)
                    ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by pjclarke View Post
                      The paper is free, it takes about 10-15 minutes to read. Call me old-fashioned, but reading a piece before you trash it seems to me a more sensible sequence than the opposite, and reduces the risk of making oneself look like a prejudiced numpty.
                      I think potentially this could be an interesting exercise but it does look like the authors incorrectly classified the papers.

                      The 97% consensus paper is starting to fall apart | Watts Up With That?

                      As it stands it´s worthless at the moment. It will have to be redone.

                      I mean if the scientist who wrote his paper disagrees with the authors that´s pretty much a fail isnt it.
                      I'm alright Jack

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X