I actually saw more similarities to pocahontas .. Seems like I wasn't the only one ....
![]()
Banned
wim121 IS NULL
I actually saw more similarities to pocahontas .. Seems like I wasn't the only one ....
![]()
District 9 is eons better u facking prawn....
Anyone who generalises is an idiot.
Banned
wim121 IS NULL
Jedi Like
gingerjedi is bm9ib2R5J3MgYml0Y2g=
According to Stephen Hawking alien visitors would more likely plunder our resources rather than try and have any sort of meaningful communication, which is what this film is about but it (laughably) portrays humans as the advanced race. Can't see the AGW connection?
I thought it was alright and I didn't see the 3D version, easily pleased I suppose.![]()
Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson
Contractor Among Contractors
amcdonald all your base are belong to me
Because it might as well as have been made by swampy, you acknowledge it's an environutter film by quoting hawkings
if you can't see the eco warmist neo socialist claptrap about how we plunder our resources and destroy our planet, and ergo anything we do that harms the planets causes global warming and can only be cured by more taxes
Where have been the last generation ????
Doing the needful since 1827
Nah, they would almost certainly be far more advanced than us* and we'd not have much to offer them in the way of plunder. A bit of anal probing and that's it.
* because the chances of them having technology far advanced of us greatly exceeds that of only just exceeding us, if they have technology to reach us, which in itself is far in advance of us.
TW - get a blu ray player cheapskate.
Jedi Like
gingerjedi is bm9ib2R5J3MgYml0Y2g=
No I don't, Hawking isn't famous for his environmental stance.
If we're not plundering our own resources why is oil so feckin' expensive eh?? This planet has been here for 6 billion years and we managed to use up most of the easily available stuff in a single century.
Personally I'm not convinced by the AGW argument but at the same time I'm not daft enough to think the human race can carry on needlessly wasting rather than innovating.
Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson