Indian Muslims

[sasguru]

Originally Posted by Moscow Mule

Based on?

The behaviour of the BJP in the past, who seem to have many features of our BNP.

[TazMaN]

Originally Posted by sasguru

The behaviour of the BJP in the past, who seem to have many features of our BNP.

Do you think they're also responsible for 911, the faked moon landing, and the discovery of a WWII bomber on the moon?

[lilelvis2000]

Originally Posted by sasguru

The behaviour of the BJP in the past, who seem to have many features of our BNP.

The BJP don't need an excuse as big as commando killers to slaughter muslims. Just the fact that a muslim has a job is enough.

[sasguru]

Originally Posted by TazMaN

Do you think they're also responsible for 911, the faked moon landing, and the discovery of a WWII bomber on the moon?

Nil point. Your understanding of what we are talking about is zero.

[TazMaN]

Originally Posted by lilelvis2000

The BJP don't need an excuse as big as commando killers to slaughter muslims. Just the fact that a muslim has a job is enough.

Perhaps but much of the world's governments appear to be in agreement with this philosophy. Actually, all throughout history this has been the case.

[sasguru]

Originally Posted by TazMaN

Perhaps but much of the world's governments appear to be in agreement with this philosophy. Actually, all throughout history this has been the case.

You mean apart from the few hundred years when Muslims were dominant and had an empire that extended from the Middle East to North Africa and Europe?
Ever heard of the Ottoman Empire?
Any idea why the Muslims always seem to be at odds with everyone else, quite unlike any other religion? The answer is in their inflexibility and certainty. So it's no surprise that they get persecuted nowadays. It wasn't always so.

[DodgyAgent]

Originally Posted by TimberWolf

We've killed far more of them for that reason over the last 10 than they will ever manage of us. Most of them were innocents too. We don't get much press coverage of that though.

I couldnt agree more. In fact I would go further we had no business declaring war on Germany in WW2, we were no better than the commandants in charge of the concentration camps. Our bombing of german cities was no different was it?

[TimberWolf]

Originally Posted by DodgyAgent

I couldnt agree more. In fact I would go further we had no business declaring war on Germany in WW2, we were no better than the commandants in charge of the concentration camps. Our bombing of german cities was no different was it?

An awful lot more people probably died as a result of us declaring war on Germany than would otherwise have died. Even the Jews probably were worse off for it (I think we covered that here not so long ago). Why does no-one mention Russian, our allies, atrocities? (I missed the programmes that have been on TV recently, anyone see them?) Everyone seems to have been killing innocents on a big scale at that time, us included.

[Bob Dalek]

Originally Posted by TimberWolf

An awful lot more people probably died as a result of us declaring war on Germany than would otherwise have died. Even the Jews probably were worse off for it (I think we covered that here not so long ago). Why does no-one mention Russian, our allies, atrocities? (I missed the programmes that have been on TV recently, anyone see them?) Everyone seems to have been killing innocents on a big scale at that time, us included.

Er, f--k off!!!!!

Hitler invaded Poland, and, according to existing treaties, we had to declare war. To suggest that we should never have stepped-in is insane! As for UK atrocities: leave it out! Piss all compared to the near-extermination of a race.

[Moscow Mule]

Originally Posted by Bob Dalek

Er, f--k off!!!!!

Hitler invaded Poland, and, according to existing treaties, we had to declare war. To suggest that we should never have stepped-in is insane! As for UK atrocities: leave it out! Piss all compared to the near-extermination of a race.

I think Stalin was just as bad as Hitler, and he was our buddy at the time...