Corporation Tax starves business of investment; hurts workers. Discuss.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Posts 1 to 10 of 12
  1. #1

    Ducklike

    Platypus 's job has never been outsourced

    Platypus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    In the pub
    Posts
    8,491
    Thanks (Given)
    25
    Thanks (Received)
    109
    Likes (Given)
    876
    Likes (Received)
    395

    Default Corporation Tax starves business of investment; hurts workers. Discuss.

    I've long thought that CT is a silly tax. Taking money from business just deprives it of the money it needs to invest in plant and machinery (which would increase productivity) and needs to invest in staff (which would lead to more, better paid staff).

    Ah ha! But don't businesses just take their fat profits and pay Fat Cats huge salaries? Yes, some money goes here, but there aren't that many 'fat cats'.

    Ah ha! But don't business just distribute profits to shareholders? Yes, but many (most?) shareholders are investment companies looking after things like pensions, ISAs and other investment vehicles, which benefit people like your family.

    Raising CT would prompt companies to raise prices, taking money from the pockets of the very people that governments say they want to help. Raising CT would reduce business investment, increase unemployment, depress wages and raise prices.

    The converse is true: Lowering CT increases business investment, decreases employment, raises wages and reduces prices, putting more money in to the pockets of those who need it most.

    So panel, what do you think? Am I right? If so, yay! Am I wrong, if so, why? I'm keen to understand this topic more fully.

  2. #2

    Contractor Among Contractors

    Lance is NOT a disguised employee

    Lance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    home
    Posts
    1,595
    Thanks (Given)
    16
    Thanks (Received)
    92
    Likes (Given)
    160
    Likes (Received)
    338

    Default

    CT taxes profit. So staff costs are before CT, so is training, and investment.

    There is an argument that lower CT increases the total tax take, but I'm not an economist. Gideon wanted to reduce CT as that should increase investment, and therefore jobs, and therefore PAYE tax.
    Certainly less tax taken by CT will increase dividends, and they are taxed anyway (and increasing). So I support some of the suggestion but not for the reasons outlined.
    Last edited by Lance; 12th September 2017 at 09:54. Reason: grammar was tulip

  3. #3

    Faqqed Off

    TheFaQQer is a fount of knowledge

    TheFaQQer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    36,152
    Thanks (Given)
    382
    Thanks (Received)
    1287
    Likes (Given)
    3705
    Likes (Received)
    3228
    Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
    Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership
    Monday 27th November 1230-1330: IPSE Update on the Autumn Budget for contractors. Register here.

  4. #4

    Prof Cunning @ Oxford Uni

    WTFH is a fount of knowledge

    WTFH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    10,378
    Thanks (Given)
    206
    Thanks (Received)
    1392
    Likes (Given)
    1203
    Likes (Received)
    3723

    Default

    Maybe if it was lowered but enforced for all businesses, then it might work.
    Strong and Stable Moderation

  5. #5

    Contractor Among Contractors

    Lance is NOT a disguised employee

    Lance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    home
    Posts
    1,595
    Thanks (Given)
    16
    Thanks (Received)
    92
    Likes (Given)
    160
    Likes (Received)
    338

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WTFH View Post
    Maybe if it was lowered but enforced for all businesses, then it might work.
    that is the answer to a different question. Google, Apple et al are US companies so they pay their dividends in the US. There aren't any easy answers to that. And as point of note the US CT is 39% and that's why they (Apple/Google) are so rich as the $$$$ are all stored offshore. They cannot repatriate without paying that 39%.

    The beauty of CT is it does have to be paid before dividends, and therefore difficult to avoid if you want to reward the shareholder. Which means London listed company values are based on them actually paying CT.

  6. #6

    More fingers than teeth

    zeitghost is a fount of knowledge


    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    35,883
    Thanks (Given)
    1199
    Thanks (Received)
    2033
    Likes (Given)
    2734
    Likes (Received)
    4758

    Default

    Pre 1965, CT didn't exist.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United...orporation_tax

    Ah, dear dead days beyond recall.

  7. #7

    Old Greg is my bitch's bitch

    northernladyuk - scorchio!

    northernladyuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Working the streets of your imagination
    Posts
    8,051
    Thanks (Given)
    1102
    Thanks (Received)
    586
    Likes (Given)
    401
    Likes (Received)
    2252

    Default

    Employers NIC is what bugs me. Abolish it, roll it into Employees NIC, increase everyone's salary accordingly. It would be much more honest.
    Where there's muck there's brass.

  8. #8

    Contractor Among Contractors

    Lance is NOT a disguised employee

    Lance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    home
    Posts
    1,595
    Thanks (Given)
    16
    Thanks (Received)
    92
    Likes (Given)
    160
    Likes (Received)
    338

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by northernladyuk View Post
    Employers NIC is what bugs me. Abolish it, roll it into Employees NIC, increase everyone's salary accordingly. It would be much more honest.
    hear hear.
    It's a political tax. Allows a chancellor to increase income tax (i.e. a tulipload of ) without losing votes.
    See You Next Tuesday

  9. #9

    Old Greg is my bitch's bitch

    northernladyuk - scorchio!

    northernladyuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Working the streets of your imagination
    Posts
    8,051
    Thanks (Given)
    1102
    Thanks (Received)
    586
    Likes (Given)
    401
    Likes (Received)
    2252

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lance View Post
    hear hear.
    It's a political tax. Allows a chancellor to increase income tax (i.e. a tulipload of ) without losing votes.
    I am not against high taxation but it should be transparent.
    Where there's muck there's brass.

  10. #10

    Ducklike

    Platypus 's job has never been outsourced

    Platypus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    In the pub
    Posts
    8,491
    Thanks (Given)
    25
    Thanks (Received)
    109
    Likes (Given)
    876
    Likes (Received)
    395

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by northernladyuk View Post
    Employers NIC is what bugs me. Abolish it, roll it into Employees NIC, increase everyone's salary accordingly. It would be much more honest.
    I think the problem is that because of all the levels and limits, there would be losers whatever you did = political minefield

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.