Kicking off on London Bridge

[Mordac]

Like Osama Bin-Laden?

Kill all Arsenal fans?

Not even in jest BP, not even in jest...

[oscarose]

The Wail have been doing some digging and it turns out one of the jihadi scum was an Arsenal fan.

London attack: Details of the ISIS killer are revealed | Daily Mail Online

And sounds like the 'muslim' gone bad t'was high as a kite too...

[BrilloPad]

Not even in jest BP, not even in jest...

Sorry about that. Though I have heard some quite extremist "solutions" to the current issue which will not solve anything. Mine seemed about as stupid....

[GJABS]

And sounds like the 'muslim' gone bad t'was high as a kite too...

There might be something in that.
I read somewhere that a large number of jihadis were regular cannabis smokers. Cannabis produces psychosis and schizophrenia in some people, which with the religious fervour of devout Muslims could be a potent mix.

[SueEllen]

There might be something in that.
I read somewhere that a large number of jihadis were regular cannabis smokers. Cannabis produces psychosis and schizophrenia in some people, which with the religious fervour of devout Muslims could be a potent mix.

The text I had translated and explained to me many years ago by old Muslim gits stated that any drugs alcohol, cannabis or tobacco was forbidden - haram.

Then later I had young Muslim men and women state that smoking cannabis or tobacco was fine as it wasn't alcohol.

[NotAllThere]

"preparation and direction" is necessary only when protesters aren't very motivated in making their protest. Such as when they are expressing an intellectual opinion rather than an emotional imperative.

Compare that footage with the following footage of extremely angry muslims causing havoc in a lecture theatre, when someone unwisely decides to insult their prophet and make a film about it. The difference in intention and passion is obvious, as is the genuineness:

(NSFW due to some written expletives)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0sRmpvdIIk

So when quiet, dignified and civilised, it's faked intellectual opinion. When it's anger and violence, it's genuine. So Muslims are by default angry, and when they're not, they're faking it. I'm glad that's cleared up.

[darmstadt]

Hassan I Sahba

[Pip in a Poke]

Hawkwind

[GJABS]

So when quiet, dignified and civilised, it's faked intellectual opinion. When it's anger and violence, it's genuine. So Muslims are by default angry, and when they're not, they're faking it. I'm glad that's cleared up.

Basically yes.
Though the muslims in the BBC group probably don't realise that they are being fake.

Humans, and human males especially, are primarily motivated by emotions. i.e. the things that they really care about cause within them an emotional reaction (anger, fear etc), leading them to take action.

So for example if a family member is killed in a car crash at an accident blackspot, a person will likely get very angry, an emotion, and this will motivate him/her to campaign for the road to be made more safe. But if the person killed is not a family member, the person will think intellectually that the road ought to be made safer, but will not have the emotional drive to do anything about it.

The group of muslims on the BBC were no doubt sympathetic and saddened by the attacks (most muslims are against terrorism, remember). But the attacks were not of enough importance to them, to motivate them, to do anything substantial about them, themselves.

[sasguru]

Basically yes.
Though the muslims in the BBC group probably don't realise that they are being fake.

Humans, and human males especially, are primarily motivated by emotions. i.e. the things that they really care about cause within them an emotional reaction (anger, fear etc), leading them to take action.

So for example if a family member is killed in a car crash at an accident blackspot, a person will likely get very angry, an emotion, and this will motivate him/her to campaign for the road to be made more safe. But if the person killed is not a family member, the person will think intellectually that the road ought to be made safer, but will not have the emotional drive to do anything about it.

The group of muslims on the BBC were no doubt sympathetic and saddened by the attacks (most muslims are against terrorism, remember). But the attacks were not of enough importance to them, to motivate them, to do anything substantial about them, themselves.

I think you're slightly deranged.