Originally posted by VectraMan
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Direct contacting
Collapse
X
-
'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!! -
-
Originally posted by Contractor UK View Post
I'd like to challenge this as complete nonsense.
If you were a major business, looking to engage a contractor, and you had the choice of an established, financially sound agency, or a one man band, then to take the risk of using a one man band, the client would, and in all cases I've ever heard of, DO, want some kind of incentive to do it.
The only way to make direct contracts worth their while for a client, is to cut out the agency margin, to make the cost to the client lower. If it were a case of "the price is the same, but it's all going to the contractor", most large, risk averse (especially in this climate) clients, who are likely to use contractors, would put a middleman in, to manage the financial side of things, and remove countless other issues with the likes of IR35 and AWD."Being a permy is like being married, when there's no more sex on the cards....and she's got fat."
SlimRick
Can't argue with thatComment
-
Originally posted by The Agents View View Postand remove countless other issues with the likes of IR35 and AWD.
The Agency Workers Directive only applies when there is an agency involved, hence the name. Surely that would add "countless other issues", not remove them. And from what I've seen of agency contracts, they involve much more IR35-problematic fettering of the contractor than a contractor's own contract would.Comment
-
Originally posted by The Agents View View PostIf you were a major business, looking to engage a contractor, and you had the choice of an established, financially sound agency, or a one man band, then to take the risk of using a one man band, the client would, and in all cases I've ever heard of, DO, want some kind of incentive to do it.Will work inside IR35. Or for food.Comment
-
Originally posted by The Agents View View PostIf you were a major business, looking to engage a contractor, and you had the choice of an established, financially sound agency, or a one man band, then to take the risk of using a one man band, the client would, and in all cases I've ever heard of, DO, want some kind of incentive to do it.
The only way to make direct contracts worth their while for a client, is to cut out the agency margin, to make the cost to the client lower. If it were a case of "the price is the same, but it's all going to the contractor", most large, risk averse (especially in this climate) clients, who are likely to use contractors, would put a middleman in, to manage the financial side of things, and remove countless other issues with the likes of IR35 and AWD.
What the client wants is an established, technically sound consultant.
And I know from experience that going direct is more profitable for me than going through an agency.Coffee's for closersComment
-
Originally posted by Spacecadet View PostWhat the client wants is an established, technically sound consultant.
Please read posts, before throwing your toys out of the pram.
As for the risks - I had an in-depth explanation, but I got logged off the board, so this is the abridged version.
Risks include:
Eligibility to work in the UK. - technically the ltd companies duty, but a MEGA problem if things slip through.
Reference checking - Who will you blame if the person turns out to murder people?
De-Motivation If a client didn't pay your bill for 90 days, how productive would you be? An agency takes that problem away.
Payment errors Mistakes happen - if they happen with an agency relationshop, you claim it back - try getting money out of a one man band because its been paid incorrectly!!
These are just a few of the potential risks. I'm not saying the agency model is perfect, but it does reduce risk, and pass the buck for certain businesses. We all know that financial people (who basically run businesses really) like risk aversion."Being a permy is like being married, when there's no more sex on the cards....and she's got fat."
SlimRick
Can't argue with thatComment
-
Originally posted by The Agents View View PostEligibility to work in the UK. - technically the ltd companies duty, but a MEGA problem if things slip through.
Reference checking - Who will you blame if the person turns out to murder people?
De-Motivation If a client didn't pay your bill for 90 days, how productive would you be? An agency takes that problem away.
Payment errors Mistakes happen - if they happen with an agency relationshop, you claim it back - try getting money out of a one man band because its been paid incorrectly!!
What else have you got?Last edited by VectraMan; 14 January 2011, 15:36.Will work inside IR35. Or for food.Comment
-
Originally posted by The Agents View View PostReference checking - Who will you blame if the person turns out to murder people?[B]Comment
-
Originally posted by VectraMan View PostI'm elligible to work in the UK, and what does an agent actually do to ensure a contractor is elligible that a client couldn't do?
I've never given references to any agent. Most of us are smart enough to know not to do that.
Perhaps, but if the contractor had agreed 90 day terms they ought to be fully productive. I recently found out my last agent only gave 30 day terms to the client, which is what I would have said if I'd been working direct.
That's a stupid reason. If I was in the client's position, I'd be far more worried about the agent doing that sort of thing than an individual I knew personally.
What else have you got?
Right now - a stack of roles on my desk that need sorting before I go home, so I'll be back over the weekend with the full version
As for checking eligibility - here, we have a direct checking system with the Home Office, but that's not what most people have - most use the bog standard Passport checked approach - there's nothing that CAN'T be done, but the RISK is that it doesn't get done because of lack of understanding - as I say - big businesses don't like risk.....(and small companies can't usually afford contractors!)"Being a permy is like being married, when there's no more sex on the cards....and she's got fat."
SlimRick
Can't argue with thatComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment