+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Posts 21 to 24 of 24
  1. #21

    My post count is Majestic

    northernladuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    32,422
    Thanks (Given)
    131
    Thanks (Received)
    1231
    Likes (Given)
    1641
    Likes (Received)
    5596

    Default

    What are you two bleating on about?
    'CUK forum personality of 2011' - Winner - Yes really!!!!

  2. #22

    Double Godlike!


    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    10,359
    Thanks (Given)
    754
    Thanks (Received)
    741
    Likes (Given)
    4919
    Likes (Received)
    2853

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by billybiro View Post
    No, the whole point is that if the role exposes you to the ability to potentially dump 10m+ into that offshore account, no amount of credit checking or any other "due diligence" (and the results thereof) is really going to make any kind of difference as to whether you'd actually do it, therefore, such checks are entirely useless. However, if the bank wants to convince itself that such nonsense actually means something, then more fool them.
    Yes, but no one here is arguing they are not useless, just that you won't get on site without one, simples.

  3. #23

    Fingers like lightning

    billybiro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    536
    Thanks (Given)
    6
    Thanks (Received)
    25
    Likes (Given)
    98
    Likes (Received)
    141

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MrMarkyMark View Post
    Yes, but no one here is arguing they are not useless, just that you won't get on site without one, simples.
    We're in agreement then.

    Thread ends.

    NLUK - You can stop stalking us now.


  4. #24

    Fingers like lightning

    Lance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    home
    Posts
    865
    Thanks (Given)
    10
    Thanks (Received)
    26
    Likes (Given)
    96
    Likes (Received)
    200

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by billybiro View Post
    Really? And exactly how does the results of a credit check against your Ltd. affect your ability to be onsite?

    It's not just finance houses and it's not about whether you might directly steal cash.
    SC has a lot of the same checks.
    It's more about do you owe money to anyone who may pressure you into doing things (like stealing information).
    It's not foolproof but the thinking is that most people are genuinely honest and only do something dodgy when under extreme pressure. Financial pressure is a starting point and often an indicator of other pressures that may be of interest.
    Similarly if your child is being held hostage by the Russian mafia you are unlikely to get SC clearance even if your credit is very good.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.