Now then, the current contract ends on 31st of July. The client manager wants me on for at least another year for a new project that begins in October, however the HR at the clientco are a bit funny.
Their policy states that no contractor should work for longer than 9 months in any calendar year. This means a three month break for me before I join back. However, the project on which the client manager wants me to start after a three month break, has an HR exception that allows contractors to work for 18 months without a break. She tried to put me on it straight away, but the HR suggested that I should take a holiday before I can join back and they have provided a provisional approval for it (everyone has targets to meet! )
The client manager wants me desperately (so she says, thankfully!) and she even wants to sort the paperwork for the contract from November 2016 for 18 months before the end of July.
She wants to do all the paperwork and a signed contract before I finish the current contract, to give me assurance that they are not playing with me and of course to get my assurance likewise. What are the panel's thoughts on:
Yes, I fully understand the risks involved here from a work perspective that they could ditch me anytime. That said, I have seen at least two contractors onboarded last week after their respective three months break.
Their policy states that no contractor should work for longer than 9 months in any calendar year. This means a three month break for me before I join back. However, the project on which the client manager wants me to start after a three month break, has an HR exception that allows contractors to work for 18 months without a break. She tried to put me on it straight away, but the HR suggested that I should take a holiday before I can join back and they have provided a provisional approval for it (everyone has targets to meet! )
The client manager wants me desperately (so she says, thankfully!) and she even wants to sort the paperwork for the contract from November 2016 for 18 months before the end of July.
She wants to do all the paperwork and a signed contract before I finish the current contract, to give me assurance that they are not playing with me and of course to get my assurance likewise. What are the panel's thoughts on:
- Signing a contract three months in advance even before it begins?
- Am I over analysing it if I say that if a role can be planned 3 months in advance then it can't be a contract role? Am I poking the tax man here?
- Having 18 months duration for a contract? Remember it is a new contract after a three month break.
- Worth taking a 3 month break for an 18 month contract? I personally would, as my warchest is healthy. However I would like to hear some non-monetary opinions.
- Anything else?
How to spend the three month holiday.I shall ask that in General
Yes, I fully understand the risks involved here from a work perspective that they could ditch me anytime. That said, I have seen at least two contractors onboarded last week after their respective three months break.
Comment