Ambiguous Termination Clause
+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Posts 21 to 25 of 25
  1. #21

    Fingers like lightning


    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Location Location
    Posts
    863
    Thanks (Given)
    28
    Thanks (Received)
    22
    Likes (Given)
    232
    Likes (Received)
    83

    Default

    Isn't the fact that the end client has said that 'op it an example of MoO?

  2. #22

    My post count is Majestic

    northernladuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    33,226
    Thanks (Given)
    136
    Thanks (Received)
    1352
    Likes (Given)
    1726
    Likes (Received)
    5815

    Default

    No. MoO is about giving work after the current agreement.
    'CUK forum personality of 2011' - Winner - Yes really!!!!

  3. #23

    I live on CUK

    SueEllen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    in the Park
    Posts
    26,940
    Thanks (Given)
    1264
    Thanks (Received)
    1028
    Likes (Given)
    4385
    Likes (Received)
    3944

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Antman View Post
    Isn't the fact that the end client has said that 'op it an example of MoO?
    MoO is complicated.

    The shortest explanation is what NLUK said.

    The longest explanation involves first what NLUK said and then what you think.

    However what NLUK said is the explanation that has been tested in a court of law. This is why his explanation is always first and is undisputed until someone goes to a higher court which overrides it.
    "Youíre just a bad memory who doesnít know when to go away" JR

  4. #24

    Respect my authoritah!

    NotAllThere's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Far away from HMRC
    Posts
    17,328
    Thanks (Given)
    187
    Thanks (Received)
    758
    Likes (Given)
    1227
    Likes (Received)
    2623

    Default

    The implication of section d is that the end client could turn around and say you are not longer required. pack your bag up and go, (like a decree / directive or and executive order ) isn't that what a contract is meant to protect against ??.
    No. Contracts lay out terms and conditions. You agreed to this clause when you signed the contract.

    Legs available to stand on: zero.
    You won. Get over it.

    --drunk on abuse of power--

  5. #25

    Respect my authoritah!

    NotAllThere's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Far away from HMRC
    Posts
    17,328
    Thanks (Given)
    187
    Thanks (Received)
    758
    Likes (Given)
    1227
    Likes (Received)
    2623

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by northernladuk View Post
    Sounds like they've done him a favour. He's so far inside IR35 it must hurt but I'd say he doesn't have a clue what that means. It's got part and parcel written all over this one.
    Please do remember that there are plenty of contractors in IR35 and they're just as entitled to post here as any other contractor.
    You won. Get over it.

    --drunk on abuse of power--

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.