• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Enforced Contractor Layoff in December

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    To clarify, everyone needs the 2 weeks off in any given year.
    its not enforced for permies over xmas though.

    I get that its cost reduction during a time where nothing is happening AND it sorts out the requirement for contractors.

    All I was wondering about was if there was any contractual reason that would make this a bad move from the clientco point of view.
    If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur. - Red Adair

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by Bluespider View Post
      To clarify, everyone needs the 2 weeks off in any given year.
      its not enforced for permies over xmas though.

      I get that its cost reduction during a time where nothing is happening AND it sorts out the requirement for contractors.

      All I was wondering about was if there was any contractual reason that would make this a bad move from the clientco point of view.
      Contractually ... NO. Reputational in the long run.. YES
      'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

      Comment


        #23
        Dont see why so many people have an issue with this, either that or they're just money grabbers.

        Current client is extending me into December then a break with a new contract starting January.

        I get a nice 3 week break instead of 2 that I normally would take this time of year. Sorted.
        I couldn't give two fornicators! Yes, really!

        Comment


          #24
          Last year i got an exception to work. Saved thew client 18 million over that time. Get some big boy projects and stop whining.
          World's Best Martini

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
            Indeed hence the financial risk but it's still imposed to all so not a differentiator in its own right.
            Pretty sure being told not to come in, while permie's still have to is a very strong defence against IR35 - it was mentioned as a factor in a successful judgement against IR35 a few years back.

            Silver bullet, not quite - but I'd feel very confident if furloughed (the term for it) during a gig.

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by centurian View Post
              Pretty sure being told not to come in, while permie's still have to is a very strong defence against IR35 - it was mentioned as a factor in a successful judgement against IR35 a few years back.

              Silver bullet, not quite - but I'd feel very confident if furloughed (the term for it) during a gig.
              Absolutely correct but read my comment on page 2. The op explicity mentions contractors AND permie..
              'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
                Absolutely correct but read my comment on page 2. The op explicity mentions contractors AND permie..
                Ths is a type of block leave. Most banks enforce it for both Perm and contract.
                Obviously, clients would rather that contractors took this off at christmas, as there is little going on.

                Its a little inconsistant though, as I have never been asked to take it.

                I can confirm, however, that a mate of mine fought an IR35 claim, against a quite iffy 5 year contract, on the basis of an enforced unpaid time off.
                HMRC dropped it on the basis of this alone.
                The Chunt of Chunts.

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View Post

                  I can confirm, however, that a mate of mine fought an IR35 claim, against a quite iffy 5 year contract, on the basis of an enforced unpaid time off.
                  HMRC dropped it on the basis of this alone.
                  I do find that very hard to believe. A mitigating factor maybe but not a 5 year gig on the basis of that alone. I didn't think they give a single reason for dropping investigations either.
                  'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
                    I do find that very hard to believe. A mitigating factor maybe but not a 5 year gig on the basis of that alone. I didn't think they give a single reason for dropping investigations either.
                    You are free to believe exactly what you want .

                    Maybe there were other factors, but I can assure you that the final decision was made due to that fact of having enforced time off.
                    To be honest other contractors and me thought he would be totally caught, we had been joking about it for a few years.
                    It puts things into perspective sightly, with regards to the actual risk of being IR35 caught.
                    The Chunt of Chunts.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View Post
                      You are free to believe exactly what you want .

                      Maybe there were other factors, but I can assure you that the final decision was made due to that fact of having enforced time off.
                      To be honest other contractors and me thought he would be totally caught, we had been joking about it for a few years.
                      It puts things into perspective sightly, with regards to the actual risk of being IR35 caught.
                      indeed, risk of investigation approx 1/1000 *
                      chance of losing (assuming you have qdos/ipse etc cover) about 1/100? **

                      1 in 100k chance of IR35 caught (until april 2017 obv)? yet some people(!) spend minutes/hours per day worrying about it

                      *In full: The Abbey Tax response to the Intermediaries Legislation (IR35) discussion document | The Abbey Tax Blog
                      section 2, 2nd paragraph
                      ** complete guess

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X