Contractor UK Bulletin Board  PayStream

Go Back   Contractor UK Bulletin Board > Contractor UK Forums > Accounting / Legal
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22nd August 2006, 10:22   #91
Cowboy Bob
Contractor Among Contractors
 
Cowboy Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,660
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by delsvan
Thats the beauty of it. I have receipts for all my expenses and Dasa Consulting wont allow me to claim anything without receipts.
OK, assuming that the £2100 is your per week gross, are you really saying you legitimately spend £1000 a week on expenses?
Cowboy Bob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd August 2006, 10:23   #92
delsvan
Not worth listening to
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Watford
Posts: 9
Default

No, that is per month. I am not paid much yet...
__________________
www.trottervanhire.com
delsvan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd August 2006, 10:25   #93
Cowboy Bob
Contractor Among Contractors
 
Cowboy Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,660
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by delsvan
No, that is per month. I am not paid much yet...
Even so, I find it hard to believe that you can legitimately spend 50% of your gross on expenses. Still if you have the receipts I guess you're safe...
Cowboy Bob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd August 2006, 10:28   #94
brobi
Lurker not a fighter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 43
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by delsvan

Calculation Result
Income before Tax £2100
Expenses £1000
Tax £252
Income after Tax £1848
Ok but your actual expenses might be train fares, petrol, IT equipment etc. So for the most part your expenses is money you spent for a service. But with mine I pay tax on 20,000 a year with no claim on the petrol (130 per month 12x130=1,560.

Calculation Result (monthly)
Income Before Tax - 5,000
Expenses (not claimed) - 160
Tax (9% account management charge) - 730
Income After - 4,110

So in summary no recipts to keep, no accounts to manage (self employed), no accountancy fees, no IR35 and overall no hassels as this firm deals with the agency directly.
brobi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd August 2006, 10:31   #95
brobi
Lurker not a fighter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 43
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmini

Its also one of those lovely offshore tax schemes!

I have only one comment to make ????
Call it what you will but if it saves me money and I can shout about it. Besides you gotta be in it to win it
brobi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd August 2006, 10:32   #96
malvolio
Super poster
 
malvolio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Walking in the garden, dreaming of Olivia...
Posts: 3,985
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brobi
Ok but your actual expenses might be train fares, petrol, IT equipment etc. So for the most part your expenses is money you spent for a service. But with mine I pay tax on 20,000 a year with no claim on the petrol (130 per month 12x130=1,560.

Calculation Result (monthly)
Income Before Tax - 5,000
Expenses (not claimed) - 160
Tax (9% account management charge) - 730
Income After - 4,110

So in summary no recipts to keep, no accounts to manage (self employed), no accountancy fees, no IR35 and overall no hassels as this firm deals with the agency directly.
I think you need to talk to an accountant. If you're netting £48k it's quite likely you should be paying higher rate...

But then again, if we didn't have people boasting about their abilities to fiddle the system- or even just ignoring it completely - we wouldn't have had S134c and IR35 in the first place.
__________________
Not dead: merely sleeping
malvolio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd August 2006, 10:35   #97
brobi
Lurker not a fighter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 43
Default Why waste money on an accountant? Financial Advisors are cheaper!

Quote:
Originally Posted by malvolio
I think you need to talk to an accountant. If you're netting £48k it's quite likely you should be paying higher rate...
No need as a friend of mine and financial advisor is a qualified tax lawyer in the UK. So I think if it was illegal he would know. Also it is safe to say that the Inland Revenue monitor this scheme very closely.
brobi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd August 2006, 10:40   #98
malvolio
Super poster
 
malvolio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Walking in the garden, dreaming of Olivia...
Posts: 3,985
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brobi
No need as a friend of mine and financial advisor is a qualified tax lawyer in the UK. So I think if it was illegal he would know. Also it is safe to say that the Inland Revenue monitor this scheme very closely.
Then perhaps you and your friend should read the news a bit more carefully. It may stop being legal in the not too distant future. But hey, what do I know...
__________________
Not dead: merely sleeping
malvolio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd August 2006, 10:43   #99
brobi
Lurker not a fighter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 43
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by malvolio
Then perhaps you and your friend should read the news a bit more carefully. It may stop being legal in the not too distant future. But hey, what do I know...
Show me the way! I am always up for some re-education.
brobi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd August 2006, 10:50   #100
Cowboy Bob
Contractor Among Contractors
 
Cowboy Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,660
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brobi
Show me the way! I am always up for some re-education.
Bear in mind that if your scheme is deemed illegal that any outstanding tax will be backdateable to December 2004.

http://www.contractoruk.com/news/002585.html

Anne Redston, of the Chartered Institute of Taxation, draws attention to the Budget small print which announces a consultation on the tax and NICs position of managed service companies.

“This is the first sign that the government is considering the tax policy issues raised by composites/umbrella companies/managed service companies separately from those of limited companies set up for one worker, or a small number of connected individuals.

“These companies are widely used to supply individual contractors to big companies in the UK. HM Revenue & Customs is concerned that these companies are avoiding - or evading - income tax and NICs, and has announced that it is consulting on new rules to prevent this,” Ms Redston said.
Cowboy Bob is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:12.


Advertisers
PayStream

CUK Navigation

Contractor Alliance
Formed a new Ltd Co?

20% off business insurance
£10 off Bauer & Cottrell contract reviews
Find co-workers & client introductions

Increase your value to clients here

Fast Company Formation
Same day online company formation £75 + VAT

Form your Ltd Co Here

Contractor Services


 
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0 © 2005, Crawlability, Inc.