• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Do clerical workers count when getting a business insurance?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    If she isn't a "fee earner" and you are a "typical IT contractor" with a PSC, then I would be very careful about making her an employee, and paying her a salary.

    Under those cirumstances, the clerical/admin work in an IT Contractor's Limited company, typically takes 20-30 minutes per month. Her salary should be commensurate with the effort.

    If your Accountant has suggested otherwise, or you have been taking counsel from "Pub Accountants/Fellow Contractors" , then you need to be concerned.
    I was an IPSE Consultative Council Member, until the BoD abolished it. I am not an IPSE Member, since they have no longer have any relevance to me, as an IT Contractor. Read my lips...I recommend QDOS for ALL your Insurance requirements (Contact me for a referral code).

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by mickael28 View Post
      Thanks for the link, I didn't know what to search for.

      I asked SJD two or even three times at the time to try and get further details to understand that, and they mainly kept coming back saying that I needed not to worry, although not much explanations about why not. I've not checked QDoS Accountancy services to see how they compare to SJD (which were kind of expensive last time I checked)
      I meant speak to the QDOS insurances people. They specialise in contractors insurance so will know exactly what you will need in your situation.
      'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by mickael28 View Post
        Hi,

        Two doubts:



        Code:
        Limited Companies
        Another exemption applies here:
        companies employing only their owner where that employee also owns 50% or more of the issued share capital in the company
        This would exempt a situation where
        (i) a controlling director (50% shares or more of shares) is the only employee; and
        (ii) where two people work for the company and have 50% of the shares each.
        I noticed in another link that they mention one would need 51% of the shares, not 50%. Do you know why that might be? or which figure is the correct one?
        Public liability and employers liability help and questions - insuredrisks.co.uk

        Code:
        If you are a limited company consisting only of yourself, and manual and clerical staff, where you own more than 51% of the business, then employers liability insurance is not required.
        If you are a limited company consisting only of yourself, and manual and clerical staff, but own less than 51% of the business then employers liability insurance is required.
        If you are a limited company with more than one person then employers liability insurance is always required.





        Regarding this, do you know what is the salary figure that makes a difference regarding Pensions auto enrolment, or where to find more info?
        Re the EL I'm relying on:

        http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/hse40.pdf

        Which says

        companies employing only their owner where that employee also owns 50% or more of the issued share capital in the company
        So I would go with 50% not 51%

        For pensions auto enrolment look at The Pension Regulators website, or refer back to your accountant (why buy a dog and bark yourself?)
        The Pensions Regulator | workplace pensions law | auto enrolment | The Pensions Regulator

        Sepecifically http://www.thepensionsregulator.gov....-to-enrol.aspx for thresholds

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by Jessica@WhiteFieldTax View Post
          companies employing only their owner where that employee also owns 50% or more of the issued share capital in the company
          But when they mention "employing only their owner", are they referring to the director?, ie, how would be classified a wife doing the admin work for the company if she's not an employee, or is she?

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by mickael28 View Post
            But when they mention "employing only their owner", are they referring to the director?, ie, how would be classified a wife doing the admin work for the company if she's not an employee, or is she?
            By owner they can only mean shareholder in context. Probably, but not necessarily, a director as well.

            Re your wife doing admin, unless a 50% shareholder she would be an employee for these purposes. The starting point is anyone paid under a contract of service, or anyone classed as a worker under EU directives, would be an employee, unless otherwise exempted (eg as 50% shareholder). I'm not aware of any other exemptions other than 50% shareholding one.

            However talk to your insurers it may not actually impact the policy cost.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by Jessica@WhiteFieldTax View Post
              By owner they can only mean shareholder in context. Probably, but not necessarily, a director as well.

              Re your wife doing admin, unless a 50% shareholder she would be an employee for these purposes. The starting point is anyone paid under a contract of service, or anyone classed as a worker under EU directives, would be an employee, unless otherwise exempted (eg as 50% shareholder). I'm not aware of any other exemptions other than 50% shareholding one.

              However talk to your insurers it may not actually impact the policy cost.
              I talked to them earlier on, and checked a few other sites, and although not much difference, for PL/EL there was a change from £100 to ~£200 depending on whether one had to insure 1 or 2 people.

              My wife is a 50% shareholder as well, hence that I don't know now if we won't require these PL/EL by law? The insurers didn't mention anything about exceptions, they just said... "just to be sure that your policy is valid, I would include 2 people", which coming from them directly is a little bit shocking...

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by mickael28 View Post
                I talked to them earlier on, and checked a few other sites, and although not much difference, for PL/EL there was a change from £100 to ~£200 depending on whether one had to insure 1 or 2 people.

                My wife is a 50% shareholder as well, hence that I don't know now if we won't require these PL/EL by law? The insurers didn't mention anything about exceptions, they just said... "just to be sure that your policy is valid, I would include 2 people", which coming from them directly is a little bit shocking...
                Any of them contractor specialists?
                'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by mickael28 View Post
                  I talked to them earlier on, and checked a few other sites, and although not much difference, for PL/EL there was a change from £100 to ~£200 depending on whether one had to insure 1 or 2 people.

                  My wife is a 50% shareholder as well, hence that I don't know now if we won't require these PL/EL by law? The insurers didn't mention anything about exceptions, they just said... "just to be sure that your policy is valid, I would include 2 people", which coming from them directly is a little bit shocking...
                  Make your wife a director and then you won't need to worry about insurance and give excuses if HMRC ever come knocking on why she is paid so much for doing SFA. She has half the shares anyway and you are married so you can't exactly run away with the company money. Also just because she is a director doesn't mean you give her access to the company bank account.

                  The form takes seconds to complete on Company's House.
                  "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
                    Any of them contractor specialists?
                    Yes, they were QDOS - live chat support. Actually, first they said 1 or 2 employees shouldn't affect the price, but when I tried and the price almost doubled, they said... "ah, in that case, I'll put two to make sure the insurance is valid". I could have asked my daughter and get a similar answer... :S. hence that I am trying to clarify with other fellow contractors that might know due to different reasons.

                    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
                    Make your wife a director and then you won't need to worry about insurance and give excuses if HMRC ever come knocking on why she is paid so much for doing SFA. She has half the shares anyway and you are married so you can't exactly run away with the company money. Also just because she is a director doesn't mean you give her access to the company bank account.

                    The form takes seconds to complete on Company's House.
                    Never thought about what implies that she is or she is not a director in our current circumstances. I'll need to research what that means for the short and long term...

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by mickael28 View Post
                      Yes, they were QDOS - live chat support. Actually, first they said 1 or 2 employees shouldn't affect the price, but when I tried and the price almost doubled, they said... "ah, in that case, I'll put two to make sure the insurance is valid". I could have asked my daughter and get a similar answer... :S. hence that I am trying to clarify with other fellow contractors that might know due to different reasons.
                      An employee can sue you further down the line if there is a health or other problem that is covered by the insurance so the risk to the insurer increases. Even if you are married to that employee there is no guarantee that you will still be married in 10+ years time when the problem appears.

                      Originally posted by mickael28 View Post
                      Never thought about what implies that she is or she is not a director in our current circumstances. I'll need to research what that means for the short and long term...
                      Google is your friend. The main risk is on her side e.g. you screw up with HMRC and she is also legally liable as a director. However as you are married you should trust each other not to do so.
                      "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X