• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

[Tax Planning][17/18] Company structure - spouse

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    [Tax Planning][17/18] Company structure - spouse

    Hello,

    I am planning to incorporate a LTD next month and I need an advice on the company structure:

    That's the plan:

    Director[50% shares]:
    • Profile: Senior Automation QA
    • Desired daily rate: ~ £350-£500
    • Target anual income: ~ £90,000 - £100,000
    • Director salary: £8,150


    Secretary[50% shares]:
    • Anual income:
      * ~ £32,000 permanent employment outside the LTD
      * £8,150 secretary salary

    1. Does this company structure make sense considering that my wife is a permie and gets salary just below the basic rate? Will there be tax advantage if I include her as an employee?
    2. Shall I reduce her shares to 35%?


    Thanks all
    Last edited by atanas; 28 January 2017, 11:36.

    #2
    1. Get an accountant.
    2. Ask him/her.
    3. Ask him/her to setup the company. A lot of firms include that in the price.
    See You Next Tuesday

    Comment


      #3
      Dividends

      You need to take into account the dividends as well when making the decision regarding shareholdings. In this case, your spouse's dividends will be taxed at the higher rate.

      I would not pay a salary to the spouse, only dividends. Set the shareholding such that it takes spouse's earnings to higher rate threshold.

      I would take professional advice as suggested above.

      Comment


        #4
        If your spouse is already getting dividends which will likely take her into the higher rate band then I can't see any logic in paying her a salary.

        Reducing the shareholding might be sensible if she is expected to stay on this salary level, but you don't want to be constantly messing around with your share structure IMO.

        Speak to an accountant.

        Comment


          #5
          You're thinking along the right lines but you need to nail down a couple of basics. Give an accountant a shout. There's a few of us on here I'm sure would be happy to help you out.

          Comment


            #6
            Pffff. 8k for secretarial duties when she's working the same hours as you. You are having a laugh.....
            'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

            Comment


              #7
              Am I right in thinking you don't have to appoint a company secretary any more? Or, is this secretary role quite literally that, and not an official role?

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by ladymuck View Post
                Am I right in thinking you don't have to appoint a company secretary any more? Or, is this secretary role quite literally that, and not an official role?
                You don't have to but it's definitely beneficial for your spouse to be a company officer if she's also a shareholder so she can be eligible for ER in the future.

                Mine is currently CS though I'm planning to make her a director. I'm not sure there's any real reason to choose one over the other.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by atanas View Post
                  Hello,

                  I am planning to incorporate a LTD next month and I need an advice on the company structure:

                  That's the plan:

                  Director[50% shares]:
                  • Profile: Senior Automation QA
                  • Desired daily rate: ~ £350-£500
                  • Target anual income: ~ £90,000 - £100,000
                  • Director salary: £8,150


                  Secretary[50% shares]:
                  • Anual income:
                    * ~ £32,000 permanent employment outside the LTD
                    * £8,150 secretary salary

                  1. Does this company structure make sense considering that my wife is a permie and gets salary just below the basic rate? Will there be tax advantage if I include her as an employee?
                  2. Shall I reduce her shares to 35%?


                  Thanks all
                  I would advice an alphabet share structure, which would be suitable in this circumstance to allow flexibility on the dividends you take out of the business, and not have the restriction of 50/50 dividends.

                  Paying your wife a salary would mean that it would all be taxed at 20% (income tax), but yes you will get the corporation tax relief on the salary of 20% also, but the tax efficient way will be with an alphabet share structure. 1 ordinary A for yourself and 1 ordinary B for your wife. Any dividends from £32k to £43k this year or £45k for 2017/18 will be taxed at 7.5%. Any dividends into the higher rate tax threshold will be taxed at 32.5%.

                  Bear in mind though that if this is all in place for the 2016/17 tax year, £5,000 of dividends can be taken tax free regardless of employment income, so would recommend utilising this if possible.

                  I hope this helps.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by TheCyclingProgrammer View Post
                    You don't have to but it's definitely beneficial for your spouse to be a company officer if she's also a shareholder so she can be eligible for ER in the future.

                    Mine is currently CS though I'm planning to make her a director. I'm not sure there's any real reason to choose one over the other.
                    CS have less legal liability as they follow the director's(') instructions.

                    They can still be taken to court for injuries during a match, but from what I've read their liability is more about not raising alarms to the right people.
                    "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X